AI for KYC and AML Automation: How Our API Expertise is Helping Integrate with New AI Platforms to Modernize Customer Experience and Compliance

Case Study

AI for KYC and AML Automation: How Our API Expertise is Helping Integrate with New AI Platforms to Modernize Customer Experience and Compliance

Overview

Like many FinTech companies, even large banks in the US are keen on new application development. One such large bank from the US is leveraging our expertise in Fintech development to enable a smooth experience for customer on-boarding and loan applications. This required implementation of the following processes within the platform:

  • Identity Verification
  • AML Screening
  • Transaction Monitoring
  • Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR)
  • Sanction Screening
  • Record Keeping
  • Risk Assessment

The ask also involved integrating the legacy system with third-party AI technology providers while ensuring fulfillment of regulatory compliance. Our extensive expertise in building and testing APIs ensured smooth integration with new AI models without causing a massive overhaul of the entire system. Our knowledge of building and integrating new APIs has accelerated KYC related tasks or procedures. Our KPI integrations interact directly with external data sources, including government databases and identity verification services.

Our implementations have helped the bank build a new scalable application to facilitate the request for loans and payment advances. Our intervention modernized the entire process of verification and sanction payment advances thereby transforming the experience of member Credit Unions seeking lending services through the new application.

Our Solution: Implementation of our Proven Methodology to Minimize Latency

  • Stateless APIs Wherever Possible – Reduces the need to store session related requirement
  • Service Mesh for Faster Communication – We created a service mesh to manage service-to-service communication in a microservices architecture
  • Decoupled Microservices – As KYC system is part of a microservices architecture, we ensured decoupled and asynchronous communication wherever possible to avoid bottlenecks
  • Minimize Authentication Overheads – Using efficient authentication protocols such as OAuth 2.0 or JWT tokens
  • Implemented Token Expiration Management – Manages token expiration and refresh tokens to avoid frequent re-authentication requests that can increase latency.
  • Efficient data Transfers Using APIs – Minimize the amount of data being transferred in API requests and responses
  • Caching Frequently Used Data – g. government-issued identity documents, public watchlists, or other verification sources
  • API Response Caching – Reduces API load. For example, once a customer’s KYC data has been validated, cache it to avoid redundant checks for subsequent transactions within a short period
  • Queue Processing for non-critical or non-real-time KYC tasks – Employ message queues (e.g., Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ) to offload tasks that don’t need immediate processing
  • API Rate Limiting – Controls the number of requests a client can send within a certain time frame.
  • API Throttling – When the API is under heavy load, throttle incoming requests gracefully by queueing requests or sending an appropriate response
  • Load Balancing API requests – By spreading them across multiple servers, using a load balancer to prevent any one server from becoming a bottleneck
  • Auto-scaling mechanisms in cloud environments – Automatically increase the number of instances handling API requests when traffic spikes occur
  • Optimized Database Queries – Ensured all database queries are optimized and properly indexing is in place for commonly accessed fields (such as customer IDs or government document numbers)
  • NoSQL for Speed – Used NoSQL databases (e.g., MongoDB, Cassandra) for faster read and write operations, especially for large-scale KYC applications
  • Fallback Mechanism – When external data provider is slow or down, allow the system to fall back on cached data
  • Concurrent API Calls – Make parallel API requests to different data providers (e.g., government databases or sanctions lists) rather than making them sequentially
  • Optimized Network Routing – Ensure that the API calls are routed through the most efficient network paths
  • API Monitoring Tools – Helped on-board API monitoring tools to identify bottlenecks and monitor data latency
  • Set-up Alerting Systems – Set up alerting mechanisms to notify your team when API latency crosses predefined thresholds
  • Regular Performance Testing – Regularly perform load testing and stress testing using tools like JMeter, Gatling, or k6 to identify potential latency bottlenecks

The service layer consists of three distinct purpose-driven sub layers that include:

  • Integration Layer
  • API Gateway Layer
  • Experience Layer

Below is an example of how we built a service layer serves as the backbone of the unified application that is used by different teams within the banks related to advances.

The Key Challenge

Ensuring API Latency and Testing to Avoid Application Breakdown

  • The app had to be designed to integrate with data in real-time to detect and report suspicious activity
  • Even with the use of third-party apps for KYC compliance handling, the data responsibility is still with the bank
  • The bank not only has to provide accurate information, but also needs to keep records up-to-date
  • APIs need to implement strong encryption standards, both in transit and at rest, to protect customer data from unauthorized access
  • This adds complexity in API design, especially when integrating with legacy systems that may not have modern encryption protocols
  • AML and KYC APIs must operate with minimal delay to ensure that customer verification and transaction monitoring occur in real-time
  • Latency issues can lead to slow responses, affecting customer experience (e.g., account creation delays) and failing to detect fraud or suspicious activities in a timely manner

Key Questions to Ask Before Launching New Features in the KYC and AML Process

  • How to ensure use of AI doesn’t impact fulfilment of compliance?
  • How to make intelligent AI Agents work alongside underwriting teams?
  • How many transactions will the app be able to process per second?
  • How many users must the app be able to support?
  • How many layers of protection are needed to set up secure the software?
  • How to ensure the app integrates new features later down the road?

How We Helped

  1. Automating KYC Processes

Real-Time Identity Verification: AI-powered APIs can instantly verify customer identities by cross-referencing government databases, social media profiles, or biometric data. This reduces the manual effort required for KYC checks and speeds up onboarding.

Document Processing: AI integrated through APIs can automatically scan and analyze documents (e.g., passports, driver’s licenses) to verify identity and compliance with KYC requirements. APIs facilitate real-time communication between AI models and KYC platforms to flag discrepancies or errors in documents.

Continuous Monitoring: APIs enable AI models to continuously monitor customer transactions and behaviors to detect suspicious activities, helping banks comply with KYC standards beyond just onboarding.

  1. Enhanced Data Accuracy for AML Compliance

Data Enrichment: APIs allow AI systems to pull data from various external sources such as credit bureaus, financial databases, or social media platforms. This enriched data helps improve the accuracy of risk profiling and identify potential money laundering risks.

AI-Driven Risk Scoring: APIs enable the integration of AI-driven risk scoring engines that can assess the risk level of customers or transactions in real-time. These APIs automate the decision-making process by flagging high-risk activities for further review.

  1. Real-Time Monitoring and Alerts

Real-Time Transaction Monitoring: AI-powered APIs monitor millions of transactions in real-time for suspicious patterns or anomalies that could indicate money laundering. APIs allow banks to integrate this capability into their core transaction systems.

Instant Alerts: APIs help automate the process of generating alerts for unusual transactions or customer behavior, allowing compliance officers to respond promptly to potential threats.

  1. Reducing False Positives in AML Systems

Advanced Pattern Recognition: AI models, accessible through APIs, can distinguish between legitimate and suspicious transactions more accurately by using machine learning to understand patterns in customer behavior. This reduces the number of false positives, a common problem in traditional AML systems.

Machine Learning Feedback Loops: APIs allow continuous feedback between AI models and AML systems, helping the AI learn from historical data and improve its detection capabilities over time.

  1. Improved Customer Experience

Faster Onboarding: With AI-powered KYC verification via APIs, banks can reduce onboarding times from days or weeks to minutes. This enhances the customer experience while ensuring compliance with regulations.

Simplified Document Collection: APIs make it easy for customers to upload required documents directly through digital interfaces, which are processed automatically by AI systems for verification.

  1. Regulatory Reporting and Auditing

Automated Regulatory Reporting: APIs can facilitate AI in automating the generation of detailed reports required by regulators for AML compliance. This includes transaction histories, risk assessments, and customer profiles, making the auditing process more efficient.

Audit Trails: APIs help ensure that AI-powered KYC and AML systems create comprehensive audit trails, tracking every decision or transaction review for compliance purposes.

  1. Cross-Border Compliance

Global Data Access: APIs can integrate AI systems with global financial data sources, allowing banks to check customers or transactions against international watchlists and sanctions databases. This is essential for cross-border AML compliance.

Dynamic Adaptation: APIs enable AI to dynamically adjust to the compliance requirements of different countries and jurisdictions by accessing regulatory data in real-time, ensuring the bank’s global operations remain compliant.

  1. Scalability and Flexibility

Scalable AI Solutions: APIs make it easy for banks to scale their KYC and AML systems by integrating additional AI capabilities as needed, without having to rebuild their infrastructure.

Customization: APIs offer flexibility in customizing AI solutions for specific KYC/AML requirements based on the bank’s risk appetite or customer base.

  1. Fraud Detection and Prevention

Real-Time Fraud Detection: APIs integrated with AI allow for real-time fraud detection by analyzing customer behaviors, transaction types, and patterns. This helps to identify potential fraud activities early and mitigate risks.

Behavioral Biometrics: AI models, accessible through APIs, can track and analyze customer behavior, such as typing speed, device usage, and navigation patterns, to identify potential identity fraud during the KYC process.

Impact

  • 50% processing time improvement in verification workflows
  • 3X increase in the speed for daily risk detection flags and alerts
  • 300% increase in speeds to scours public data sources to validate information
  • 100% automation in data input of location, transaction history, linked accounts, and device details
  • 100% automation in matching customer’s information like name, date of birth, and address as verified in third-party data sources
Banking Compliance

 

Download More Case Studies

Get inspired by some real-world examples of complex data migration and modernization undertaken by our cloud experts for highly regulated industries.

Contact Your Solutions Consultant!

Payments Modernization: Migrating Multiple Legacy Payment Advances Applications from PowerBuilder to a Unified Trade Management System

Use Case Study

Payments Modernization: Migrating Multiple Legacy Payment Advances Applications from PowerBuilder to a Unified Trade Management System

Overview

API driven Payments Modernization was the need of the hour for a top-tier bank. They were dealing with multiple legacy applications built on PowerBuilder that were in use for purposes ranging from Credit Check to managing Borrower details, and more. The client wanted to cut down on technical debt by migrating, unifying, and automating operations under a modernized Trade Management Platform. They had identified a sophisticated platform for trade management, valuations, reporting, and accounting purposes. However, this also meant building a new application interface and a service layer that interacts as an intermediary with the newly inducted trade management platform.

The ask was to build a new service layer and interface to connect with upstream and downstream groups/teams/workflows. These upstream and downstream configurations are complex as whenever the borrower data is altered, it has ramifications for other teams & processes as well.

Our automated rules-based configurations and use of AI Bots ensure employees do not spend too much time in manually data input and validation for the following:

Credit Check | Capital Stock Check | Borrower Advance Requests | Borrower Advances History | Borrower Related CRM Systems | Interest Rates for Borrowers | Advances Pricing | Advances Restructuring | Creating Exception and Red Flags

  • The client used our expertise in open-source languages, modern coding standards, and hybrid cloud data integration to deploy the modernized application in record time.
  • The bank was able to provide new experiences to member banks by integrating with third-party components and simultaneously meeting compliance needs.

Our expertise has helped the bank incur significant saving for the following teams and advances groups within the bank:

They can be broadly be classified as Short Term (ST), Long Term (LT), and Mid-Term (MT) Advances.

  • Adjustable-Rate Credit (ARC) Advance (ST, MT & LT)
  • Amortizing Advance (MT & LT)
  • Callable ARC Advance (ST, MT & LT)
  • Callable Fixed-Rate Advance (MT & LT)
  • Fixed-Rate Advance (ST, MT & LT)
  • Fixed-Rate Advance with a SOFR Cap* (MT & LT)
  • Overnight Advance
  • Principal-Deferred Advance (MT & LT)
  • Putable Advance (MT & LT)
  • Repo Advance (ST, MT & LT)

Our Solution: Deploying a Service Layer Driven by API-Based Routing & Integration

The bank had decided to modernize and transform the entire advances vertical. The strategy was driven by investing and integrating with a new-age trade management SaaS platform. However, this also required building a new application interface and a service layer that can interact with the platform.

To enable the service layer, our team built the essential architecture to integrate with third-party components.

In this case, it meant the service layer interacted with member banks’ systems and databases to access and update the latest information about the member banks.

We designed the architecture as an intermediary to access and process information related to capital stock, borrower history, credit check, etc.

The service layer consists of three distinct purpose-driven sub layers that include:

  • Integration Layer
  • API Gateway Layer
  • Experience Layer

This service layer serves as the backbone of the unified application that is used by different teams within the banks related to advances.

Challenge

The bank faced numerous challenges related to modernizing applications related to advances, such as payment advances or loan advances. These challenges include both technical and regulatory complexities. Below are some of the key issues:

  1. Legacy Infrastructure and Systems

Compatibility Issues: Many banks operate on legacy core banking systems that are not easily compatible with modern technologies. This makes it difficult to integrate new software for handling advances without significant re-engineering.

Monolithic Architectures: Older systems tend to be monolithic, making it hard to extract specific functions, like advances, and modernize them independently without affecting the entire system.

  1. Data Migration

Data Integrity Risks: Migrating historical data related to advances is complex and error-prone. Ensuring data accuracy, consistency, and integrity during migration to modern platforms can be challenging.

Compliance with Data Regulations: Given the sensitivity of financial data, migrating data while ensuring compliance with regulations under CCPA, AML-CFT, KYC and other financial privacy laws posed a major challenge.

  1. Integration with Third-Party Systems

Complex Integration: Modernizing applications often requires integrating with third-party platforms (like payment gateways or CRM systems). Ensuring seamless interaction between legacy systems and these platforms can be complex.

Real-Time Processing: Banks need real-time processing for loan advances, but older systems may lack the capability to handle real-time transactions, leading to delays and errors during the modernization process.

  1. Regulatory Compliance

Constantly Evolving Regulations: The financial sector is heavily regulated, and keeping up with regulatory changes (e.g., Basel III, KYC, AML regulations) while modernizing applications related to advances is difficult.

Security and Auditing: Compliance with auditing, reporting standards, and ensuring high levels of security for customer data, especially when dealing with real-time financial advances, adds another layer of complexity.

  1. Security Concerns

Cybersecurity Threats: Modernizing legacy applications opens up new vectors for cyberattacks. Advances-related systems need robust security features, such as encryption, secure API gateways, and fraud detection mechanisms.

Fraud Prevention: Automating advances-related processes, like credit checks and loan disbursements, can increase the risk of fraud if not properly secured.

  1. Customer Experience

Maintaining Service Quality During Transition: Banks need to ensure that services, particularly related to advances, remain uninterrupted and meet customer expectations during the modernization process.

New User Interfaces: Introducing modern interfaces or mobile capabilities can disrupt existing customer experiences, especially if the changes are not intuitive or require retraining.

  1. Cost and Resource Allocation

High Costs: Modernizing banking systems can be expensive, requiring significant investment in new technology, human resources, and third-party services. The cost of downtime during system upgrades can also be high.

Skill Gaps: Finding skilled professionals who understand both legacy systems and modern technologies can be difficult, leading to higher training costs and longer timelines for modernization.

  1. Performance and Scalability

Scalability: Legacy systems often lack the ability to scale effectively, which can be a problem when modernizing applications to meet growing demand for advances, especially in times of economic volatility.

Performance Degradation: There is a risk that performance might degrade during the transition phase, affecting the speed and accuracy of processing advances-related transactions.

  1. Change Management

Resistance to Change: Employees and management may resist adopting new technologies, particularly when the changes involve altering workflows or retraining staff.

Training and Adoption: New systems often require employees and customers to learn new processes and tools. Ensuring smooth adoption and training is a key challenge during modernization.

  1. Technical Debt

Accumulation of Technical Debt: Banks may have years of accumulated technical debt, including poorly documented code and outdated technologies, which must be addressed before or during the modernization process.

  1. Time Constraints

Long Development Cycles: Modernization projects often take longer than expected due to the complexity of legacy systems, increasing the risk of project delays and budget overruns.

Maintaining Compliance with Market Changes: Banks need to adapt to rapidly changing market conditions and customer needs while modernizing their systems for advances.

How We Helped

We deployed a new architecture that makes it smoother for borrower member banks to raise requests for and receive advances to manage their capital and interest rates.

  • Enabled direct Payment Advances Requests for Borrower Member Banks
  • Automating Rate of Interest Calculations for Borrower Member Bank
  • Implementing standardized fixed-rate advances the tenure for borrowers to choose from
  • Allowing customization for borrower banks on the loan period
  • Creating and raising red flags or exceptions when advances requests are raised
  • Automating workflows for pricing methodologies and policy implementations
  • Automating processes related to rate and advances restructuring based on borrower credit score
  • Managing borrower member bank credit score based on their borrowed capital stock

The open architecture that we deployed has helped the borrower member banks to access many components of the newly integrated trade management platform

It vastly improved the member bank’s experience and advance process turnaround times by doing the following:

  • Automating exception-based workflows that was manually handled previously
  • Enabling transparency and speed of calculations to show member banks loan repayment schedules
  • Making the whole process of raising advance requests and its process transparent for the borrowers
  • Maintaining all the records related to advances, trade, and transactions with full compliance and audit transparency
  • Automating management and distribution of necessary information to be shared with counterparts in member banks
  • Creating data integrations necessary to feed data from the core engines into the new trade management platform
  • Ensuring accurate data and its availability for the proper functioning of valuations, risk, and accounting calculations

Impact

  • 100% on-time feature release for new payment advances features
  • 5X faster turnarounds for credit check and total borrowing reporting
  • Bots enabling 3X faster calculations for loan rate restructuring
  • Enabled self-service payment advances request option for borrower member banks
  • 50% reduction in service calls and email back and forth for receiving information on advances
API Driven Payments

 

Download More Case Studies

Get inspired by some real-world examples of complex data migration and modernization undertaken by our cloud experts for highly regulated industries.

Contact Your Solutions Consultant!

How Our GenAI Bots Enhance 401K Regulatory Compliance and Form 5500 Report Generation

Use Case Study

How Our GenAI Bots Enhance 401K Regulatory Compliance and Form 5500 Report Generation

Overview

401(k) processes involve several tasks involving plan administrators and plan sponsors. Many of these tasks depend on manual data extraction that can lead to errors such as an incorrectly listed plan sponsor information or a blank participant count field. It often happens as a result of due to miscommunication or a lack of coordination between the plan administrator and sponsor. In the absence of timely updates, chances of missing deadlines become real.

This is where our expertise in implementing AI Bots can make a big difference by providing real-time information and generating reports. With our simple and cost-effective AI configurations, we can integrate Bots and create automated workflows that will save you from non-compliance and penalties. AI can completely eliminate the several manual tasks involved in the filing of Form 5500 and reconciliation of data.

Our experts implemented and tested these Bots for one of the largest retirement plan providers in the US. The client was able to develop a mobile application to help its customers to make easy transactions and apply for various financial aids with simple clicks. For example, payments, annuity programs, health programs, etc. As a result, the client was able to enable live audit processes and significantly improve data accuracy with the use of AI powered WorkBots.

Finally, we also ensured thorough testing of the new application before it is released for the users. It required device platform compatibility testing as the newly launched automated workflows will be accessed on different devices, such as mobiles, iPads, etc.

Primary QA scenarios when testing new applications involve the following:

Usability of the application

UI and API

Testing for data security and privacy

Bug management with JIRA

Compatibility testing across all iOS and Android devices

Our Solution: Use AI Bots Configured by Our Experts

Get Super-Efficient Assistants to do tasks such as the Following:

  • Fetch updated annuitant statuses for live audit processes
  • Generate specific contracts and compliance documents
  • Boost human reviews in maintaining consistency with legal standard
  • Enable faster and detailed cross-verification against contract terms
  • Scan legal texts, analyze case laws, regulatory updates, and compliance
  • Auto-update changes in contact, beneficiary status, and employment changes

Challenge

  • Monitoring and updating participant records ensure that plans remain compliant with regulations
  • Plan administrators struggle to organize, store, retrieve, and use participant data effectively
  • It is cumbersome to review participant data regularly to ensure it is up-to-date and accurate
  • Errors in participant data causing miscalculations in retirement savings, incorrect distributions, and various legal complications
  • Plan administrators are challenged with labor-intensive tasks as the Plan Sponsor, 3(16) and 3(38) fiduciaries
  • They spend a lot of time in manually verifying relevant data to stay abreast of ever-changing regulations
  • Risk of errors in manual Form 5500 and other submitted reports increasing the risk of late submissions and penalties

The Many Ways Our AI Configurations Can Help

Configuring AI to Automate 401(k) Plan Administration Manual Tasks

Robo Advisors: AI Bots can double up as Robo Advisors to provide tailored advice to 401(k) plan participants.

Form 5500 preparation: Use data automation and AI Bot amplified review to correctly list plan sponsor information

Track Deadlines: Configure AI driven alerts to ensure plan sponsors and administrators are always on track with compliance deadlines

Raise Auto-Alerts:  AI can help raise alerts to ensure timely deposit of employee contributions and document loan defaults

Amplify Review: AI can speed up the process of annual reviews that have to be undertaken by the plan fiduciaries

Send timely notices: AI Bots can gather all necessary information and format it to send notices to participants, beneficiaries, and eligible employees

Impact

  • Automate 90% of all manual calculations done by plan administrators
  • Save up 80% of time spent on coordinating with sponsors manually
  • Enable 99% chances of errors in data entries that can lead to penalties
  • Automate 95% of all sponsor uploads and data extraction tasks
401(k) Retirement Process Automation

 

Download More Case Studies

Get inspired by some real-world examples of complex data migration and modernization undertaken by our cloud experts for highly regulated industries.

Contact Your Solutions Consultant!

Code Migration & Testing: Refactoring legacy codes written in outdated languages such as AngularJS, VB.NET, Visual Basic, C, and/or .NET Framework

Use Case Study

Code Migration & Testing: Refactoring legacy codes written in outdated languages such as AngularJS, VB.NET, Visual Basic, C, and/or .NET Framework

Overview

Why choose refactoring?

Our client is a financial services company in the US providing retirement planning services as a key offering. They had a legacy core system that had undergone many changes since 2000s in multiple applications – used for processing retirement plans and retirement savings related processes. The legacy application was written in Java 1.4 and ran on an un-supported application server built using legacy codes.

Java 1.4 had to be switched to a supported Java version and updated to a contemporary application server. The application team was worried about making changes without a safety net of tests as the codebase had grown over time and had complex dependencies, both with internal and external applications.

The decision makers responsible for system modernization therefore had two options to modernize their existing code base. Either undertake a complete rewrite, which is essentially building a whole new application, or put some serious effort into refactoring current code and configuration.

The choice to rewrite is a big one, and it requires massive investments into new skill and new technologies. Hence, the client opted for a refactoring strategy to make incremental changes in the internal structure of software, thereby making it easier to understand and cheaper to make modifications while keeping the core functionalities intact.

Our Solution: In-House Automation Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools: Our QA team uses a proprietary automation tool that integrates with Playwrite, an end-to-end testing software for web applications and Cypress for the applications Java code upgrade.

Static Analysis: The QA Team used this in-house automation tool to detect any potential issues introduced during the code refactoring. These tools can help identify unintended side effects.

Proficiency in Legacy Frameworks: Our QA and Test Engineers brought their hands-on experience in working with legacy frameworks such as VB.NET, Visual Basic, Visual FoxPro

Right Modernization Roadmap: We classified the requirement into part such as the follows and divided the testing and QA team accordingly:

  1. A team dedicated to legacy application codes that just require a change of interface of the legacy system – migrate to Java based interface
  2. A team dedicated to testing parts of the application that have been integrated with multiple new features
  3. A team dedicated to complete transitioning of hybrid legacy code of the application to the most updated version of Java

Challenge: Testing legacy code often requires making changes to the production code

Legacy systems typically lack the features and structures necessary to support modern testing practices. Here’s why changes in production code are sometimes necessary:

  1. Lack of Testability

Tightly Coupled Code: Legacy code often has tightly coupled components, making it difficult to isolate individual units for testing. To enable unit testing, developers may need to refactor the code to decouple these components, which involves changing the production code.

Difficulty in mocking dependencies: Dependencies are difficult to track in legacy systems, hence making it challenging to mock them in tests. Refactoring of code requires accepting dependencies through parameters or constructors that reflect changes in the production code.

  1. Absence of Automated Tests

Adding Test Hooks: Legacy code might not be designed with testing in mind, lacking hooks or interfaces that allow automated testing. Developers may need to add such hooks or refactor the code to make it testable, which necessitates modifications to the production code.

Testable Architectures: Modern testing relies on certain architectural patterns, such as Model-View-Controller (MVC) or Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA). Legacy code may need to be restructured or partially rewritten to adopt these patterns, requiring changes to the production code.

  1. Difficulty in Isolating and Mocking

Hard-Coded Dependencies: Legacy code often has hard-coded dependencies, such as database connections or file paths, making it difficult to test in isolation. To facilitate testing, these dependencies might need to be abstracted into interfaces or replaced with configurable options, which involves changes to the production code.

Use of Static Methods: Use of static methods in legacy code can create hidden dependencies that make testing difficult. Refactoring the code to minimize global state or to avoid static methods can improve testability, but it requires altering the production code.

  1. No Separation of Concerns

Single Responsibility Principle: Legacy code often violates the Single Responsibility Principle, with methods or classes performing multiple tasks. To make the code testable, developers might need to break down these methods or classes into smaller, single-responsibility units, which involves changes to the production code.

Extracting Methods or Classes: Large methods or classes in legacy code might need to be split into smaller, more manageable pieces to facilitate testing. Extracting methods or creating new classes to handle specific tasks requires modifying the production code.

  1. Enhancing Code Coverage

Unreachable Code: Some parts of the legacy code may be difficult or impossible to reach through the existing code paths, making it hard to test those areas. Developers might need to modify the code to expose these paths or make them more accessible for testing.

Introducing Logging and Monitoring: To better understand how legacy code behaves under different conditions, developers might add logging or monitoring capabilities. While these changes improve the ability to test and debug the code, they also alter the production code.

  1. Improving Performance and Stability

Performance Optimization: Legacy code might not perform well under test conditions, especially if it was written without considering modern performance standards. Optimizing the code to run efficiently in a test environment might involve changes to the production code.

Stabilizing the Codebase: Legacy code might contain fragile or unstable sections that cause tests to fail intermittently. Stabilizing these sections to make the codebase more reliable often requires changes to the production code.

  1. Compliance with Testing Frameworks

Adapting to Modern Frameworks: Modern testing frameworks require code to adhere to certain practices and patterns. Legacy code might need to be refactored to be compatible with these frameworks, necessitating changes to the production code.

Adding Annotations or Metadata: Some testing frameworks rely on annotations or metadata to identify testable components. Adding these to legacy code requires modifying the production code.

  1. Creating a Safety Net for Future Changes

Building a Test Suite: To create a safety net for future changes, developers might need to modify the legacy code to make it more testable, allowing them to build a comprehensive test suite. This ensures that future changes can be made with confidence, but it requires initial changes to the production code.

Incremental Refactoring: Refactoring legacy code incrementally, in a way that introduces tests along the way, involves changing the production code in small, controlled steps to gradually improve its testability.

How We Helped: We Ensured the Refactoring Does Not Change Production Code

Our refactoring strategy has improved the internal structure of the code without altering its external behavior. Here’s how we ensured that the behavior of production code remains unchanged during refactoring:

  1. Comprehensive Test Coverage

Automated Tests: Before starting refactoring, we ensured there is comprehensive test coverage, including unit tests, integration tests, and functional tests. These tests covered all critical paths and edge cases in the code.

Baseline Testing: We ran all tests to establish a baseline before refactoring. This ensured that the code behaves as expected before any changes are made.

Test-Driven Development (TDD): Wherever possible, we used TDD to write tests before making changes. This ensured that the refactored code passed the same tests as the original code.

  1. Refactoring in Small Steps

Incremental Changes: Make small, incremental changes rather than large, sweeping changes. This makes it easier to identify any issues that arise and ensures that the code remains stable throughout the process.

Continuous Testing: After each small change, run the full test suite to confirm that the behavior remains consistent. This continuous feedback loop helps catch issues early.

  1. Maintained Behavioral Consistency

Behavior-Preserving Transformations: Ensure that each refactoring step is a behavior-preserving transformation, meaning that it changes the structure or organization of the code without altering its functionality or outputs.

Refactoring Patterns: Use well-known refactoring patterns, such as extracting methods, renaming variables, or simplifying expressions, that are designed to be safe and behavior-preserving.

  1. Used Version Control

Branching: Use of version control to create a separate branch for refactoring was an all-encompassing strategy. It isolated the changes and allowed reverting to the original code, if necessary, without affecting the production code.

Committed Often: Committing changes frequently, along with passing test results, created a clear history of what was changed and ensured that each step maintains the code’s behavior.

  1. Peer Review and Pair Programming

Code Reviews: We had additional developers to review refactoring changes to ensure there are no unintended behavior changes. Peer reviews helped catch issues that might be missed by automated tests.

Pair Programming: We engaged in pair programming during refactoring. Having additional developer to work alongside testers helped ensure that changes remain behaviorally consistent.

  1. Document Refactoring Changes

Refactoring Logs: Our QA Team kept a log of all refactoring activities, including what was changed and why. This helped track the rationale behind the changes and makes it easier to review and verify that the code’s behavior has not been altered.

Update Documentation: Ensured that any changes to the code’s structure are reflected in the documentation, particularly if the refactoring improves or alters how the code is understood.

  1. Use Feature Flags (if applicable)

Feature Flags: Whenever refactoring involved changing or introducing a new functionality, we used feature flags to toggle the new code on or off. This allows us to safely deploy the refactored code and test it in production without exposing it to all users.

Staged Rollout: We gradually rolled out the refactored code using feature flags, starting with a small subset of users or environments. Monitor for any issues before fully enabling the changes.

  1. Refactoring with a Safety Net

Canary Releases: Our QA team deployed the refactored code to a small segment of the production environment (canary release) to observe its behavior in a controlled manner. It helped us identify any unexpected issues before the full deployment.

Monitored Production Metrics: Our QA and Test Engineers an eye on production metrics (e.g., performance, error rates) during and after the refactoring process to quickly identify and address any anomalies.

  1. Rollback Plan

Prepare Rollback Plan: We had set up a pre-meditated rollback plan in place before refactoring. So that if at all anything goes wrong, we can quickly revert to the previous, stable version of the code.

Backup and Restore: Our QA and Test Engineers had ready mechanisms in place to restore the previous version of the code and data if necessary.

Impact

  • Zero code breakage when migrating to Java 1.4
  • 90% savings in time spent on testing new release
  • 50% reduced time spent on troubleshooting codes where issues appear
  • 100% test coverage in systems that cannot be interfaced with directly

 

Download More Case Studies

Get inspired by some real-world examples of complex data migration and modernization undertaken by our cloud experts for highly regulated industries.

Contact Your Solutions Consultant!

How Our Automated Testing Solution Helped One of the Fastest Growing Supply Chain Service Providers in the USA

Use Case Study

How Our Automated Testing Solution Helped One of the Fastest Growing Supply Chain Service Providers in the USA

Overview

One of the fastest-growing supply chain service providers in the USA required a dedicated Automated Testing and QA Services team. They had few manual testers and wanted to onboard a dedicated testing automation team with proven experience and knowledge of using Jenkins, C#, and SQL. The company was performing manual testing of our warehouse management system (WMS) but due to resource constraint and lack of skills, they were performing a very limited amount of automated regression testing.
Regression testing will let us know when a change we make unintentionally breaks something else. The company was looking for testing automation solutions and testers with experience in Selenium running on top of Jenkins. The regression test sizes could wary vary significantly from creation and shipping of an order (in 24 steps) to editing a charge code (in 3 steps).
For this project, the company needed a trusted vendor to build and execute the approved framework and thereafter running 50 initial tests. The company would then maintain and update the tests as UI code is updated with future enhancements.

Our Solution

It provided the ability to test an application with less manpower but more thoroughly.

  • Deployed a more robust architecture with reusability of codes in mind
  • Resulted in automation code that was used for longer periods of time
  • Ensured less maintenance than a simple record/playback solution
  • Translated to a substantial savings over the course of long projects

The Requirements we Fulfilled: Meeting all Specifications on the Test Framework

  • We created and deployed a Selenium (or other) automated testing framework that integrates with the company’s infrastructure
  • Create a database-driven test framework whereby the data feeding into each automated test is database driven so additional test cases can be created without updating the test
  • Whenever the client’s team adds a test case data, the tests should run for all the data
  • Create group/suite/set of automated tests so that some tests can be run more often than others – e.g. Test Group#1, Test Group#2, etc.
  • The framework must be able to run tests – Development, Quality Assurance (QA) and Production Environments
  • It would be nice if the framework could be deployed so that tests can be run on a developer’s local environment, but this is not required
  • Allow different data sets for different environments. For example, in the Production, Dev & QA
  • In the database tables, particular test needed to be flagged to run in any or all Dev, QA, or Prod environments
  • The requirement also stated the need for creating a platform to run upon Jenkins or any similar server

Challenge: Skills required to create automated tests that are easy to maintain and extend

  • Tests were to be created in C#, JavaScript and/or SQL Server so the client’s development team can create and deploy additional tests or update existing tests when the tested functionality is updated
  • Delivery of the test to the client required integration into the client’s test catalog. However, because the client did not have enough Business Analysis/QA Resources, not all previous tests were fully defined at the beginning of the project
  • A video walk-through of each test explaining what the page does, how it works, and items to be tested were a part of the mandate
  • The project execution also had the provision for supporting the company in deployment of virtual machines needed to support the test framework

How We Helped

  1. Integration Testing

Ensuring seamless integration with existing systems like warehouse management, CRM, and financial accounting software.

Data Consistency: Verifying that data remains consistent across all integrated systems.

API Compatibility: Ensuring APIs between systems function correctly and handle errors gracefully.

Interdependencies: Identifying and testing interdependencies between the new features and existing functionalities.

  1. Performance and Load Testing

Assessing the application’s performance under realistic load conditions to ensure it can handle peak traffic.

Peak Load Simulation: Simulating high traffic volumes and transaction loads to test the system’s performance and identify bottlenecks.

Scalability Testing: Ensuring the application can scale effectively to handle increased load.

Resource Utilization: Monitoring and optimizing CPU, memory, and network usage during peak operations.

  1. Data Accuracy and Integrity

Ensuring the accuracy and integrity of data processed by the new route optimization algorithms and notification systems.

Real-time Data Testing: Testing with real-time data to uncover issues that might not appear with mock data.

Edge Cases: Identifying and testing edge cases in route optimization, such as unexpected traffic conditions or route blockages.

Data Validation: Validating that data input and output by the algorithms are accurate and reliable.

  1. User Acceptance Testing (UAT)

Ensuring the updated system meets the end-users’ requirements and expectations.

Scenario-based Testing: Developing real-world scenarios for users to test the new features.

Feedback Incorporation: Collecting and incorporating feedback from users during UAT.

Training and Documentation: Providing adequate training and documentation to users for the new features.

  1. Regression Testing

Ensuring that new updates do not adversely affect existing functionalities.

Test Coverage: Ensuring comprehensive test coverage for all existing features.

Automated Regression Tests: Implementing automated regression tests to quickly identify any issues introduced by new updates.

Test Environment Parity: Maintaining parity between test environments and production environments to ensure accurate test results.

  1. Security Testing

Ensuring that the updates do not introduce security vulnerabilities.

Vulnerability Scanning: Performing regular vulnerability scans on the updated application.

Penetration Testing: Conducting penetration tests to identify and address security weaknesses.

Data Protection: Ensuring data encryption and secure data handling practices are in place.

  1. Customer Notification System Testing

Challenge: Ensuring the new customer notification system functions correctly and provides accurate, timely notifications.

Message Accuracy: Verifying that notifications contain accurate information.

Delivery Timeliness: Ensuring notifications are sent and received promptly.

Load Handling: Testing the notification system’s ability to handle large volumes of messages without delays or errors.

  1. Change Management and Rollback Plans

Managing changes effectively and having a robust rollback plan in case of issues.

Version Control: Using version control to manage different versions of the software and ensure smooth rollbacks if needed.

Change Documentation: Documenting all changes thoroughly to facilitate quick troubleshooting and rollback if necessary.

Rollback Procedures: Developing and testing rollback procedures to ensure they can be executed quickly and effectively.

  1. Continuous Integration and Deployment (CI/CD)

Integrating continuous testing into the CI/CD pipeline to ensure quick detection and resolution of issues.

Automated Testing: Implementing automated tests within the CI/CD pipeline to catch issues early.

Build Verification: Ensuring each build passes a comprehensive suite of tests before deployment.

Deployment Automation: Automating deployment processes to reduce manual errors and improve efficiency.

  1. Communication and Coordination

Ensuring effective communication and coordination among development, testing, and operations teams.

Cross-functional Collaboration: Promoting collaboration between different teams to ensure all aspects of the update are thoroughly tested.

Issue Tracking: Using issue tracking systems to monitor and manage testing issues and resolutions.

Regular Updates: Providing regular updates to all stakeholders on the progress and status of testing and deployment activities.

Benefits for Logistics IT Leaders

  • 70% fewer hours spent on QA for new releases 
  • 90% reduction in number of production issues
  • 40% faster deployment cycles
  • 60% faster in-app load times

 

Download More Case Studies

Get inspired by some real-world examples of complex data migration and modernization undertaken by our cloud experts for highly regulated industries.

Contact Your Solutions Consultant!

Specialized Software Testing for Logistics and Fleet Management

Use Case Study

Specialized Software Testing for Logistics and Fleet Management

Overview

Logistics and transportation companies rely on a sophisticated applications to manage fleet, track shipments, optimize routes, and handle inventory. These applications integrate with various systems, including warehouse management, customer relationship management (CRM), and financial accounting software.

Time and again, logistics companies develop a need to implement major software updates aimed at improving route optimization algorithms and integrating a new customer notification system. However, they face a number of challenges caused by inefficient testing which can lead to the following:

Emergency Rollback: The development team initiates an emergency rollback to the previous stable version of the software. However, due to the lack of a coordinated rollback plan, this process is chaotic and takes longer than anticipated, exacerbating downtime.

Root Cause Analysis: A thorough root cause analysis is conducted to identify all the points of failure in the testing and deployment processes.

Our Solution: Helping Logistics Industry to Launch Optimized Algorithms, Software Updates, and Integrate Flawlessly with Analytics Applications or Data

  • Understanding the range, load, and volume per API and verifying capacity of each individual API, as well as the system as a whole
  • Create JMeter framework to test the system and each of the Inbound and Outbound APIs thoroughly from an end-to-end standpoint
  • Configure integration between both in-house and third-party applications and provide a common layer to build upon
  • Ensure Warehouse Management System (WMS) and automation integration layer provides a timely response in under one second
  • Ensure timely response for 1000s of order requests per minute while maintaining zero errors and any loss of data
  • Performance measurement of API endpoints, Process/System APIs, and the containers used for hosting them
  • End-to-end performance testing on all Inbound and Outbound APIs, including the WMS and other client’s applications
  • Using Apache JMeter, with a custom framework to comprehensively test the system and each of the Inbound and Outbound APIs
  • Script APIs individually and then combine to model or simulate a real-world process on interconnected applications via APIs
  • Monitoring WMS and other integrated applications to ensure all API requests reach their intended destination, with no loss of data/transactions
  • Accurately simulate expected volumes of load, to measure the capacity of the integrated applications, WMS system, and client applications
  • Automated Observability to diagnose limitations with infrastructure leading to failure in process a specified number of requests per minute
  • Making configuration changes to ensure flawless API response time for a planned transaction volume of a specified number Order requests per minute

Challenge

During the software development lifecycle, the update undergoes extensive testing. However, several issues arise due to inadequate testing procedures:

Inadequate Test Coverage: The testing team focuses primarily on the new features (route optimization and customer notifications) but neglects to comprehensively test the integration points with existing systems.

Insufficient Load Testing: The updated software is not adequately tested for high load scenarios. The logistics application needs to handle peak times with thousands of shipments processed simultaneously, but the load testing is performed with a much smaller data set.

Uncoordinated Deployment: The update is deployed to the live environment without a proper rollback plan or sufficient coordination with other teams responsible for related systems.

Mock Data Discrepancies: During testing, mock data is used instead of real-time data. This leads to discrepancies when the system interacts with real data post-deployment.

The Failure

Once the updated software goes live, the following issues occur:

System Crash During Peak Hours: The application experiences severe performance degradation and eventually crashes during peak operational hours due to unanticipated load. The insufficient load testing fails to reveal this critical issue during the pre-deployment phase.

Route Optimization Malfunction: The new route optimization algorithm contains a bug that wasn’t detected because the testing didn’t cover all edge cases. This results in inefficient routing, causing delays in deliveries and increased fuel costs.

Integration Breakdown: The logistics application fails to communicate properly with the warehouse management system, leading to discrepancies in inventory data. Orders are incorrectly marked as shipped or remain unprocessed, causing chaos in order fulfillment.

Notification System Failures: The new customer notification system sends incorrect or duplicate notifications. Customers receive multiple delivery confirmations and cancellations, leading to confusion and a surge in customer service inquiries.

Financial System Discrepancies: The application generates incorrect billing information, causing issues in financial reconciliation and leading to inaccurate invoices being sent to customers.

How We Helped

  1. Integration Testing

Ensuring seamless integration with existing systems like warehouse management, CRM, and financial accounting software.

Data Consistency: Verifying that data remains consistent across all integrated systems.

API Compatibility: Ensuring APIs between systems function correctly and handle errors gracefully.

Interdependencies: Identifying and testing interdependencies between the new features and existing functionalities.

  1. Performance and Load Testing

Assessing the application’s performance under realistic load conditions to ensure it can handle peak traffic.

Peak Load Simulation: Simulating high traffic volumes and transaction loads to test the system’s performance and identify bottlenecks.

Scalability Testing: Ensuring the application can scale effectively to handle increased load.

Resource Utilization: Monitoring and optimizing CPU, memory, and network usage during peak operations.

  1. Data Accuracy and Integrity

Ensuring the accuracy and integrity of data processed by the new route optimization algorithms and notification systems.

Real-time Data Testing: Testing with real-time data to uncover issues that might not appear with mock data.

Edge Cases: Identifying and testing edge cases in route optimization, such as unexpected traffic conditions or route blockages.

Data Validation: Validating that data input and output by the algorithms are accurate and reliable.

  1. User Acceptance Testing (UAT)

Ensuring the updated system meets the end-users’ requirements and expectations.

Scenario-based Testing: Developing real-world scenarios for users to test the new features.

Feedback Incorporation: Collecting and incorporating feedback from users during UAT.

Training and Documentation: Providing adequate training and documentation to users for the new features.

  1. Regression Testing

Ensuring that new updates do not adversely affect existing functionalities.

Test Coverage: Ensuring comprehensive test coverage for all existing features.

Automated Regression Tests: Implementing automated regression tests to quickly identify any issues introduced by new updates.

Test Environment Parity: Maintaining parity between test environments and production environments to ensure accurate test results.

  1. Security Testing

Ensuring that the updates do not introduce security vulnerabilities.

Vulnerability Scanning: Performing regular vulnerability scans on the updated application.

Penetration Testing: Conducting penetration tests to identify and address security weaknesses.

Data Protection: Ensuring data encryption and secure data handling practices are in place.

  1. Customer Notification System Testing

Challenge: Ensuring the new customer notification system functions correctly and provides accurate, timely notifications.

Message Accuracy: Verifying that notifications contain accurate information.

Delivery Timeliness: Ensuring notifications are sent and received promptly.

Load Handling: Testing the notification system’s ability to handle large volumes of messages without delays or errors.

  1. Change Management and Rollback Plans

Managing changes effectively and having a robust rollback plan in case of issues.

Version Control: Using version control to manage different versions of the software and ensure smooth rollbacks if needed.

Change Documentation: Documenting all changes thoroughly to facilitate quick troubleshooting and rollback if necessary.

Rollback Procedures: Developing and testing rollback procedures to ensure they can be executed quickly and effectively.

  1. Continuous Integration and Deployment (CI/CD)

Integrating continuous testing into the CI/CD pipeline to ensure quick detection and resolution of issues.

Automated Testing: Implementing automated tests within the CI/CD pipeline to catch issues early.

Build Verification: Ensuring each build passes a comprehensive suite of tests before deployment.

Deployment Automation: Automating deployment processes to reduce manual errors and improve efficiency.

  1. Communication and Coordination

Ensuring effective communication and coordination among development, testing, and operations teams.

Cross-functional Collaboration: Promoting collaboration between different teams to ensure all aspects of the update are thoroughly tested.

Issue Tracking: Using issue tracking systems to monitor and manage testing issues and resolutions.

Regular Updates: Providing regular updates to all stakeholders on the progress and status of testing and deployment activities.

Benefits for Logistics IT Leaders

  • 75% reduction in maintenance cost
  • 80% reduction in manual effort
  • 70% improved business process & infrastructure availability
  • 60% faster test automation development
Software Testing for Logistics

 

Download More Case Studies

Get inspired by some real-world examples of complex data migration and modernization undertaken by our cloud experts for highly regulated industries.

Contact Your Solutions Consultant!

How DevOps and Rapid Containerization Saved 70% Development Time and Reduced 45% Infra Cost

Case Study

How DevOps and Rapid Containerization Saved 70% Development Time and Reduced 45% Infra Cost Savings

Overview

Why product engineering teams need DevOps experts who are hands-on with rapid container deployments and orchestration?

The use of containers binds together software development and operational IT skills. It requires the ability to encapsulate code together with libraries and dependencies.  

Some Example Microservices and Dependencies:

  1. Customer Loan Account Management: This microservice handles account creation, modification, credit history mapping, collateral data, etc. It requires knowledge of data querying (e.g., PostgreSQL) to store or retrieve account information.
  2. Collateral Processing Microservice: This microservice manages collateral processing, including credit-check analysis, bill payments, and transaction history retrieval. It may utilize messaging queues (e.g., Apache Kafka) for asynchronous communication.
  3. Authentication Microservice: This microservice handles user authentication and authorization. It may rely on authentication libraries (e.g., OAuth 2.0) for identity management.

Application containerization is effective for recurring background processes involving batch jobs and database jobs. With application containerization, each job can run without interrupting other data-intensive jobs happening simultaneously.

Skills required for containerization?

Along with expertise in handling platforms like Kubernetes for container orchestration, you also need hands-on experience in container distribution management and in enabling hardened API endpoints.

Our ability to spin up new container instances helps run multiple application testing projects in parallel. Our DevOps Engineers are adept at standing-up similar runtime environments – mirroring and production without impacting any other process. Container orchestration is also the key to maintaining uniformity in development, test, and production environments. Our knowledge of code reusability ensures components are used multiple times in many different applications thereby also speeding up developers’ ability to build, test, deploy, and iterate.

The Challenge

Monolithic Architecture

  • The legacy IT system was a rigid monolith running on legacy programming language that did not support new age experiences and struggled to meet compliance
  • The existing monolithic architecture posed challenges in deployment, scalability, and reliability
  • Deploying updates or new features required deploying the entire application, leading to longer release cycles and increased risk of downtime

Limited Scalability

  • Scaling the monolithic application horizontally was difficult, as the entire application had to be replicated to handle increased load.
  • This resulted in inefficiencies and higher infrastructure costs.

Reliability Concerns

  • Monolithic applications are more prone to failures, as a single bug or issue in one part of the application can affect the entire system
  • It can lead to service disruptions and customer dissatisfaction.

Migration planning and high availability

  • Migrating a specific function to an individual microservice requires expert assessment of reusable components, code libraries, and other dependencies that can be clubbed together
  • It is essential to monitor containerized environments to ensure peak performance levels by collecting operational data in the form of logs, metrics, events, and traces

Solution

Decomposition of Monolith: Identified and decomposed monolithic components into smaller, loosely coupled microservices based on business capabilities, allowing for independent development, deployment, and scaling.

Containerization of Microservices: Packaged each microservice and its dependencies into separate containers using Docker, ensuring consistency and portability across development, testing, and production environments.

Orchestration with Kubernetes: Deployed microservices on a Kubernetes cluster to automate container orchestration, scaling, and management, enabling seamless deployment and efficient resource utilization.

Service Mesh Implementation: Implemented a service mesh to manage inter-service communication, monitor traffic, enforce security policies, and handle service discovery, improving reliability and fault tolerance.

CI/CD Pipeline Integration: Established CI/CD pipelines to automate the build, test, and deployment processes for microservices, ensuring rapid and reliable software delivery while minimizing manual intervention.

 

How we Helped

  • Our domain-driven design approach helped define the boundaries of the microservice from a business point of view
  • As each microservice was getting assigned to a different container resulting in a large modular architecture, we structured its management and orchestration
  • Managed Kubernetes enabled optimal pod distribution amongst the nodes
  • Observability generated data to show how much resources would any container optimally need
  • Enabled visualization on the number of clusters, nodes, pods, and other resources for each container
  • Imparted training sessions to learn about containerization tools like Docker and Kubernetes, fostering teamwork across departments
  • The shift to containerization encouraged staff to try new methods, share insights, and continuously learn from each other
  • Regular feedback sessions allowed teams to voice concerns, suggest improvements, and refine containerization strategies over time
  • Milestones in containerization progress leading to new application feature release is speeding modernization initiatives

Impact

  • Weeks, not months is the new normal for launching new applications
  • 70% decrease in the time taken for testing and infrastructure provisioning
  • Zero downtime experienced when releasing a new feature in the live environment
  • USD 40,000 saved in operating costs through optimized infrastructure management
  • 45% cost savings in infrastructure and IT operations costs other spent on expensive resources
  • 999% uptime enabled for the applications with use of optimized container orchestration

Benefits

Simplified Deployment: With microservices, deploying updates became easier. Each service can be updated independently, cutting release times and downtime.

Enhanced Scalability: Microservices allow for flexible scaling of services, reducing costs and optimizing resources as needed. Improved Reliability: By separating services and using a service mesh, the system became more reliable, with fewer disruptions and better user experiences.

Agility and Innovation: Microservices and CI/CD enable quick experimentation and deployment of new features, keeping the customer competitive. Cost Efficiency: Microservices and containerization save costs by using resources more efficiently and reducing downtime expenses.

Containerization

 

Download More Case Studies

Get inspired by some real-world examples of complex data migration and modernization undertaken by our cloud experts for highly regulated industries.

Contact Your Solutions Consultant!

Impact

How to Ensure HIPAA Compliance When Migrating to Office 365 from Google Workspace, Box, GoDaddy, Citrix or any Similar Platform

Case Study

How to Ensure HIPAA Compliance When Migrating to Office 365 from Google Workspace, Box, GoDaddy, Citrix or any Similar Platform

Overview

Incorrect configuration of Microsoft 365 can lead to non-compliance of HIPAA or Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Ensuring complete adherence to Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) regulations is another important checkbox that a migration plan must cover.

Here are some key steps to ensure HIPAA Compliance with Microsoft 365:

Data Encryption: Encrypt data at rest and in motion on the server

Use a valid SSL certificate: Ensure the Exchange Server has a valid SSL certificate from a trusted authority

Enable Outlook Anywhere: Ensure Outlook Anywhere is enabled and configured properly

Ensure Autodiscover works: Ensure Autodiscover works

Use Microsoft Entra ID: Use Microsoft Entra ID to implement HIPAA safeguards

Check Microsoft 365 subscription: Ensure the Microsoft 365 subscription includes the necessary HIPAA compliance features

Configure security and compliance settings: Configure the necessary security and compliance settings in the Compliance Center

Your migration partner must be mindful of documenting all movement, handling, and alterations made to the data while the migration is underway.

The Challenge

Storage limitations, limited archiving capabilities, and moving over to Microsoft 365 from on premise email exchange are some a key reasons to migrate. End-Of-Life (EOL) and Microsoft Exchange On-premise protocols getting phased are also a big motivation factor.

The constant need to calculate what it costs to support massive volumes of email traffic is influencing migration decision making. But no matter what, the reasons,

Let’s take a look at the other technical challenges often encountered with Office 365 Migration:

  • Many special character from platforms such as Google Workspace are unsupported in Microsoft 365
  • Errors can arise if the folder names and files are unsupported in Microsoft 365
  • Challenges arise when transfer file size packages exceed limits set by Microsoft 365
  • Request limits and API throttling needs to be understood before starting any migration
  • File permission access and user data access requires rigorous permission mapping exercise

Migration Methodology & Approach

Assessment and Planning:

    • Our Migration Specialists will conduct a comprehensive assessment of the existing platform environment, including user accounts, data volume, configurations, and integrations.
    • Develop a detailed migration plan outlining the sequence of tasks, timelines, resource requirements, and potential risks.
    • Coordinate with stakeholders to gather requirements and expectations for the Office 365 environment.

Data Migration:

    • Transfer user emails, calendars, contacts, and other relevant data from platforms like Google Workspace to Office 365 using appropriate migration tools and methods.
    • Migrate shared drives, documents, and collaboration spaces to corresponding Office 365 services (e.g., SharePoint Online, OneDrive for Business, Teams).

Configuration and Customization:

    • Configure Office 365 tenant settings, user accounts, groups, and permissions to mirror the existing Google Workspace setup.
    • Implement custom configurations, policies, and security settings as per client’s requirements.
    • Integrate Office 365 with existing IT infrastructure, applications, and third-party services as necessary.

Training and Support:

    • Provide training videos and documentation (Microsoft content) to familiarize users with Office 365 applications, features, and best practices.
    • Offer ongoing support and assistance to address user queries, issues, and feedback during and after the migration process.

Testing and Validation:

    • Conduct thorough testing of the migrated data and functionalities to ensure accuracy, completeness, and integrity.
    • Perform user acceptance testing (UAT) to validate that all required features and functionalities are working as expected.
    • Address any discrepancies or issues identified during testing and validation.

Deployment and Go-Live:

    • Coordinate with the client’s IT team and stakeholders to schedule the deployment of Office 365 services and finalize the transition.
    • Monitor the migration process during the go-live phase and address any issues or concerns in real-time.
    • Provide post-migration support and follow-up to ensure a successful transition to Office 365.

Key Considerations for Maintaining HIPAA Compliance

Business Associate Agreement (BAA): Ensure your Microsoft migration partner signs a Business Associate Agreement (BAA). This agreement establishes the responsibilities of Microsoft as a HIPAA business associate, outlining their obligations to safeguard protected health information (PHI).

Data Encryption: Utilize encryption mechanisms, such as Transport Layer Security (TLS) or BitLocker encryption, to protect PHI during transmission and storage within Office 365.

Access Controls: Implement strict access controls and authentication mechanisms to ensure that only authorized personnel have access to PHI stored in Office 365. Utilize features like Azure Active Directory (AAD) for user authentication and role-based access control (RBAC) to manage permissions.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP): Configure DLP policies within Office 365 to prevent unauthorized sharing or leakage of PHI. DLP policies can help identify and restrict the transmission of sensitive information via email, SharePoint, OneDrive, and other Office 365 services.

Audit Logging and Monitoring: Enable audit logging within Office 365 to track user activities and changes made to PHI. Regularly review audit logs and implement monitoring solutions to detect suspicious activities or unauthorized access attempts.

Secure Email Communication: Implement secure email communication protocols, such as Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) or Microsoft Information Protection (MIP), to encrypt email messages containing PHI and ensure secure transmission.

Data Retention Policies: Define and enforce data retention policies to ensure that PHI is retained for the required duration and securely disposed of when no longer needed. Use features like retention labels and retention policies in Office 365 to manage data lifecycle.

Mobile Device Management (MDM): Implement MDM solutions to enforce security policies on mobile devices accessing Office 365 services. Use features like Intune to manage device encryption, enforce passcode policies, and remotely wipe devices if lost or stolen.

Training and Awareness: Provide HIPAA training and awareness programs to employees who handle PHI in Office 365. Educate them about their responsibilities, security best practices, and how to identify and respond to potential security incidents.

Regular Risk Assessments: Conduct regular risk assessments to identify vulnerabilities and risks associated with PHI in Office 365. Address any identified gaps or deficiencies promptly to maintain HIPAA compliance.

Proven Migration Experience

  • 100+ Migration projects involving 50 to 10,000 users
  • 80% reduction in time and costs
  • 8TB to 30TB data migration volumes handled
  • 80% elimination of expensive backups and migration cost
Cloud Migration

 

Download More Case Studies

Get inspired by some real-world examples of complex data migration and modernization undertaken by our cloud experts for highly regulated industries.

Contact Your Solutions Consultant!

How We Enabled 50% Reduction in Product Release Cycles with Our DevOps and DataOps Services

Case Study

How We Enabled 50% Reduction in Product Release Cycles with Our DevOps and DataOps Services

Overview

Lack of DataOps skills can become an impediment for release engineers who have to manage tight deployment windows. The release engineers of one of our Banking Clients faced a similar situation and were constantly challenged by errors arising from automated release of a database and related application codes.

Without knowledge of automated tools, Developers have to make backups manually before releasing any new change, while storing data in the event of a failure. With growing volumes of data these Data Operations can get immensely expensive and time consuming. The need of the hour was to reduce valuable time, money, and effort spent on error-handling and rollbacks. This also meant onboarding experienced DevOps engineers who can write software extensions for connecting new digital banking services to the end customer. The skills involved included knowledge of continous automated testing and the ability to quickly replicate infrastructure for every release.

Our Solution: Conquering DevOps for Data with Snowflake

  • Reduces schema change frequency
  • Enables development in preferred programming languages
  • Supports SQL, Python, Node.Js, Go, .NET, Java among others
  • Automates Data Cloud implementation automates DevOps tasks
  • Helps build ML workflows with faster data access and data processing
  • Powers developers to easily build data pipelines in Python, Java, etc.
  • Enables auto-scale features using custom APIs for AWS and Python

Challenge

Automated release of database and related application code were building up several challenges, including:

Data Integrity Issues: Automated releases may lead to unintended changes in database schema or data, causing data integrity issues, data loss, or corruption.

Downtime and Service Disruption: Automated releases may result in downtime or service disruption if database migrations or updates are not handled properly, impacting business operations and customer experience.

Performance Degradation: Automated releases may inadvertently introduce performance bottlenecks or degrade database performance if changes are not thoroughly tested and optimized.

Dependency Management: Automated releases may encounter challenges with managing dependencies between database schema changes and application code updates, leading to inconsistencies or deployment failures.

Rollback Complexity: Automated releases may complicate rollback procedures, especially if database changes are irreversible or if application code relies on specific database states.

Security Vulnerabilities: Automated releases may introduce security vulnerabilities if proper access controls, encryption, or data protection measures are not implemented or properly configured.

Compliance and Regulatory Risks: Automated releases may pose compliance and regulatory risks if changes are not audited, tracked, or documented appropriately, potentially leading to data breaches or legal consequences.

Testing Overhead: Automated releases may require extensive testing to validate database changes and application code updates across various environments (e.g., development, staging, production), increasing testing overhead and time-to-release.

Version Control Challenges: Automated releases may encounter challenges with version control, especially if database changes and application code updates are managed separately or if versioning is not synchronized effectively.

Communication and Collaboration: Automated releases may strain communication and collaboration between development, operations, and database administration teams, leading to misalignment, misunderstandings, or conflicts during the release process.

How We Helped

  • Our Developers helped stand-up multiple isolated, ACID-compliant, SQL-based compute environments as needed
  • Toolset expertise eliminated the time and effort spent on procuring, creating, and managing separate IT or multi-cloud environments
  • We helped automate the entire process of creating new environments, auto-suspend idle environments
  • Enabled access to live data from a provider account to one or many receiver/consumer accounts
  • Our solution creates a copy of the live data instantly in metadata, without the need to duplicate

The Impact

  • 40% improvement in storage costs and time spent on seeding preproduction environment
  • 80% reduction in time spent on managing infrastructure, installing patches, and enabling backups
  • 80% of time and effort saved in enabling software updates so that all environments run the latest security updates
  • 80% elimination of expensive backups required to restore Tables, Schemas, and Databases that have been changed or deleted
DevOps with Snowflake

 

Download More Case Studies

Get inspired by some real-world examples of complex data migration and modernization undertaken by our cloud experts for highly regulated industries.

Contact Your Solutions Consultant!

Integration Challenges Solved: Contract Driven Development and API Specifications to Fulfill Executable Contracts

Case Study

Integration Challenges Solved: Contract Driven Development and API Specifications to Fulfill Executable Contracts

Overview

There are several challenges to integration testing that can be solved using Contract-Driven Development and API Testing. Using this methodology, our experts ensure testing of integration points within each application are performed in isolation. We check if all messages sent or received through these integration points are in conformance of the documentation or contract.

A contract is a mutually agreed API specification that brings consumers and providers on the same page. What however makes contract-driven API development complex is the way data is often interpreted by both the provider and consumer.

Let’s consider an example where two microservices, Order Service and Payment Service, need to exchange data about an order. The Order Service provides the order details, including the total amount and customer information, while the Payment Service processes payments.

Typical Scenario: When the Order Service sends the order amount as a floating-point number (e.g., 99.99), but the Payment Service expects the amount as an integer representing cents (e.g., 9999).

Expertise Required:

API Contract: Define the API contract specifying that the order amount is sent as a string representing the amount in cents (e.g., “9999”).

Data Transformation: Implement a data transformation layer that converts the floating-point number to the expected integer format before sending the data to the Payment Service.

Validation: Add validation checks to ensure that the order amount is in the correct format before processing payments.

Our Solution: Enabling API Specifications as Executable Contracts

  • Enabled adherence of API specification as an executable contract
  • Defined API specifications at a component level for consumer and provider applications
  • Deployed API specifications as contract test cases
  • Leveraged Automation Testing Tools to check backward compatibility with existing API Consumers/Clients
  • Automated creation of new connections and test cases on introduction of new environment
  • Built API Specifications that are machine learning parsable codes stored in a central version control system

Challenge

Semantic Differences:

  • Microservices may have different interpretations of the same data types, leading to semantic mismatches.
  • For example, one service may interpret a “date” as a Unix timestamp, while another may expect a date in a specific format.

Data Serialization:

  • When services communicate over the network, data must be serialized and deserialized.
  • Different serialization frameworks or libraries may handle data types differently, causing mismatches.

Language-Specific Data Types:

  • Microservices may be implemented in different programming languages with their own data type systems.
  • For example, a string in one language may not map directly to the string type in another language.
  • Versioning and Evolution:
  • Changes to data types over time can lead to compatibility issues between different versions of microservices
  • Adding new fields or changing existing data types can break backward compatibility

Null Handling:

  • Null values may be handled differently across services, leading to unexpected behavior
  • Some services may expect null values, while others may not handle them gracefully

How We Helped

API Contract and Documentation:

  • Clearly defined and document API contracts with agreed-upon data types
  • Specify data formats, units, and constraints in API documentation to ensure consistency

Use Standardized Data Formats:

  • Adopt standardized data formats like JSON Schema or OpenAPI to describe API payloads.
  • Standard formats help ensure that all services understand and interpret data consistently.

Data Transformation Layers:

  • Implement data transformation layers or microservices responsible for converting data between different formats
  • Use tools like Apache Avro or Protocol Buffers for efficient data serialization and deserialization

Shared Libraries or SDKs:

  • Develop and share libraries or SDKs across microservices to ensure consistent handling of data types
  • Centralized libraries can provide functions for serialization, validation, and conversion

Schema Registry:

  • Use a schema registry to centrally manage and evolve data schemas
  • Services can fetch the latest schema from the registry, ensuring compatibility and consistency

Schema Evolution Strategies:

  • Implement schema evolution strategies such as backward compatibility
  • When introducing changes, ensure that older versions of services can still understand and process data from newer versions

Validation and Error Handling:

  • Implement robust validation mechanisms to catch data type mismatches early
  • Provide clear error messages and status codes when data types do not match expected formats

Testing:

  • Conduct thorough testing, including unit tests, integration tests, and contract tests
  • Test scenarios should include data type edge cases to uncover potential mismatches

Versioning and Compatibility:

  • Use versioning strategies such as URL versioning or header versioning to manage changes
  • Maintain backward compatibility when making changes to data types

Code Reviews and Collaboration:

  • Encourage collaboration between teams to review API contracts and data models
  • Conduct regular code reviews to identify and address potential data type mismatches

Runtime Type Checking:

  • Some programming languages offer runtime type checking or reflection mechanisms
  • Use these features to validate data types at runtime, especially when integrating with external services

The Impact

Improved Interoperability: Ensures seamless communication between microservices regardless of the languages or frameworks used.

Reduced Errors: Minimizes the chances of runtime errors and unexpected behavior due to data type inconsistencies.

Faster Integration: Developers spend less time resolving data type issues and can focus on building features.

Easier Maintenance: Centralized data transformation layers and standardized contracts simplify maintenance and updates.

Contract Driven Development

 

Download More Case Studies

Get inspired by some real-world examples of complex data migration and modernization undertaken by our cloud experts for highly regulated industries.

Contact Your Solutions Consultant!